The Brantford Record

Committee of Adjustment

December 7, 2022

What was decided (5 motions)

5 carried, 0 recorded otherwise. Every motion below is printed as the minutes print it.

A. THAT Application A39/2022 requesting relief from Section 7.8.2.1.1.3 Zoning By-law 160-90 to permit a converted dwelling with a lot area of 246 m2, whereas 360 m2 is required, BE APPROVED, conditional upon the registration of an environmental easement for operational noise and vibration emissions, in favour of CN Rail; B. THAT the reason(s) for approval are as follows: the proposed variance is in keeping with the general intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By- law 160-90, the relief requested is considered minor in nature and is desirable for the appropriate development and use of the land; and, C. THAT pursuant to Section 45(8) – (8.2) of the Planning Act, R.S.O 1990, c.P.13, the following statement SHALL BE INCLUDED in the Notice of Decision: “Regard has been had for all written and oral submissions received from the public before the decision was made in relation to this planning matter, as discussed in Section 6.2 of Report No. 2022-708.” Recorded vote on Item 3.1: YES: Dan Namisniak, Virginia Kershaw, Tara Gaskin, Gregory Kempa, Krystyna Brooks, Mike Bodnar – 6 NO: None – 0
Moved by Virginia Kershaw, seconded by Mike Bodnar
Carried Unanimously
A. THAT Application A40/2022 requesting relief from Section 7.8.2.1.8.2 to allow for one converted dwelling unit size of 53 m 2 to be permitted where a minimum of 55 m2 is required, and from Section 7.8.2.1.12 to permit a 210 m2 expansion (an 87% increase of gross floor area) where Zoning By-law 160-90 requires an expansion be no more than the lesser of 50% of the existing gross floor area or 110.0 m 2, BE APPROVED; B. THAT the reason(s) for approval are as follows: the proposed variance is in keeping with the general intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By- law, the relief requested is considered minor in nature and is desirable for the appropriate development and use of the land; and C. THAT pursuant to Section 45(8) – (8.2) of the Planning Act, R.S.O 1990, c.P.13, the following statement SHALL BE INCLUDED in the 4 Notice of Decision: “Regard has been had for all written and oral submissions received from the public before the decision was made in relation to this planning matter, as discussed in Sections 6.2 and 7.4 of Report No. 2022-730.” Recorded vote on Item 3.2: YES: Dan Namisniak, Tara Gaskin, Gregory Kempa, Krystyna Brooks, Mike Bodnar – 5 NO: Virginia Kershaw – 1
Moved by Krystyna Brooks, seconded by Gregory Kempa
Carried
A. THAT Application A41/2022 requesting relief from Section 6.18.8 of Zoning By-law 160-90 to permit 12 parking spaces where 15 are required, BE APPROVED; B. THAT the reason(s) for approval are as follows: the proposed variances are in keeping with the general intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, the relief requested is considered minor in nature and 5 is desirable for the appropriate development and use of the subject lands; and, C. THAT pursuant to Section 53(17) – (18.2) and Section 45(8) – (8.2) of the Planning Act, R.S.O 1990, c.P.13, the following statement SHALL BE INCLUDED in the Notice of Decision: “Regard has been had for all written and oral submissions received from the public before the decision was made in relation to this planning matter, as discussed in Section 6.2 of Report No. 2022-719” Recorded vote on Item 3.3: YES: Dan Namisniak, Virginia Kershaw, Tara Gaskin, Gregory Kempa, Krystyna Brooks, Mike Bodnar – 6 NO: None – 0
Moved by Virginia Kershaw, seconded by Gregory Kempa
Carried Unanimously
6 A. THAT Application A38/2022 requesting relief from Section 478.4.12 of Chapter 478 of the City of Brantford Municipal Code to permit the flashing illumination of a sign to be located 35 m from a residential zone, whereas a minimum of 40 m is required, BE APPROVED; B. THAT the reason(s) for approval are as follows: the proposed variances are in keeping with the general intent of the Official Plan, Zoning By-law and Chapter 478 of the Municipal Code, the relief requested are considered minor in nature and are desirable for the appropriate development and use of the subject lands; and, C. THAT pursuant to Section 45(8) – (8.2) of the Planning Act, R.S.O 1990, c.P.13, the following statement SHALL BE INCLUDED in the Notice of Decision: “Regard has been had for all written and oral submission received from the public before the decision was made in relation to this planning matter, as discussed in Section 6.2 of Report No. 2022-707.” Recorded vote on Item 3.4: YES: Dan Namisniak, Virginia Kershaw, Tara Gaskin, Gregory Kempa, Krystyna Brooks – 5 NO: None – 0
Moved by Virginia Kershaw, seconded by Greg Kempa
Carried Unanimously
THAT the minutes of the October 5, 2022 Committee of Adjustment meeting BE APPROVED.
Moved by Krystyna Brooks, seconded by Virginia Kershaw
Carried

The town’s own record

Read the minutes this page was read from →

Where this page and that document disagree, the document is right and this record is wrong. Say so and it will be corrected.