Committee of Adjustment

A. THAT Application A12/2020 requesting relief from Section 7.3.2.1.3 of the City of Brantford Zoning By-law 160-90 to permit a maximum lot coverage of 42%, whereas a maximum lot coverage of 35% is permitted BE APPROVED; and B. THAT the reason(s) for approval area as follows: the proposed variance is in keeping with the general intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, the relief requested is considered minor in nature and is desirable for the appropriate development and use of the land; and C. THAT pursuant to Section 45(8) – (8.2) of the Planning Act, R.S.O 1990, c.P.13, the following statement SHALL BE INCLUDED in the Notice of Decision: “Regard has been had for all written and oral submission received from the public before the decision was made in relation to this planning matter, as discussed in Section 6.2 of Report 2020-309”.

A. THAT Application A11/2020 requesting relief from the City of Brantford Zoning By-law 160-90 to permit a minimum front yard of 3.2 m, whereas 6 m or the established building line is required, BE APPROVED; and B. THAT the reason(s) for approval are as follows: the proposed variance is in keeping with the general intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, the relief requested is considered minor in nature and is desirable for the appropriate development and use of the subject land; and C. THAT pursuant to Section 45(8) – (8.2) of the Planning Act, R.S.O 1990, c.P.13, the following statement SHALL BE INCLUDED in the Notice of Decision:" "Regard has been had for all written and oral submissions received from the public before the decision was made in relation to this planning matter, as discussed in Section 6.2 of Report No. 2020-305”.

A. THAT Application A04/2020 requesting relief from Section 6.3.2.1.8 of Zoning By-law 160-90 (Variance 1) to permit an accessory building to be located 1.0 m from the existing swimming pool, whereas 1.5 m is required BE REFUSED; and B. THAT Application A04/2020 requesting relief from Section 6.4.1.1 of Zoning By- law 160-90 (Variance 2) to permit the eaves on the accessory building to be located 0.1 m from the southerly lot line whereas 0.3 m is required BE APPROVED; and C. THAT the reasons for refusal of Variance 1 from Section 6.3.2.1.8 are as follows: the proposed variance is not desirable for the appropriate development and use of the land; and D. THAT the reason(s) for approval of the Variance 2 from Section 6.4.1.1 are as follows: the proposed variance is in keeping with the general intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, the relief requested is considered minor in nature and is desirable for the appropriate development and use of the land; and E. THAT pursuant to Section 45(8) – (8.2) of the Planning Act, R.S.O 1990, c.P.13, the following statement SHALL BE INCLUDED in the Notice of Decision: “Regard has been had for all written and oral submission received from the public before the decision was made in relation to this planning matter, as discussed in Section 6.2 of Report 2020-107.”

THAT the following minutes BE APPROVED: 6.1.1 Committee of Adjustment - June 17, 2020 Recorded vote on Item 6.1: YES: Virginia Kershaw, Tara Gaskin, Lee Rynar, Dan Namisniak, Greg Kempa and Krystyna Brooks – 6 NO: None – 0 Item 6.1