Taken from the roll call in the town’s own minutes. The minutes record who was not there and almost never why.
What was decided (4 motions)
4 carried, 0 recorded otherwise. Every motion below is printed as the minutes print it.
THAT all Items for Consideration/ Consent Items (Items 7.1 and 7.2) BE APPROVED. Recorded vote on all Items for Consideration/ Consent Items (Items 7.1 and 7.2): YES (10): Councillor Weaver, Councillor Vanderstelt, Councillor Utley, Councillor Sless, Councillor McCreary, Councillor Martin, Councillor Carpenter, Councillor Antoski, Councillor Van Tilborg, and Councillor Wall
Moved by Councillor Martin, seconded by Councillor McCreary
A. THAT Official Plan Amendment Application No. OP-03-20 initiated by the Corporation of the City of Brantford to amend the City of Brantford Official Plan and the County of Brant Official Plan by updating the second unit dwelling policies and accessory residential dwelling unit policies, BE APPROVED in accordance with the applicable provisions as noted in Section 8.0 of Report 2020-63; and B. THAT Zoning By-law Amendment Application No. PZ-13-19 initiated by The Corporation of the City of Brantford to amend City of Brantford Zoning By-law 160-90 and County of Brant Zoning By-law 61-16 by updating the zoning regulations and definitions, BE APPROVED in accordance with the applicable provisions as noted in Section 8.0 of Report 2020-63; and, C. THAT Pursuant to Section 34(18.2) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13. the following statement SHALL BE INCLUDED in the Notice of Decision: “Regard has been had for all written and oral submissions received from the public before the decision was made in relation to this planning matter, as discussed in Sections 7.2 of Report 2020-63.” Recorded vote on Item 5.1: YES (9): Councillor Weaver, Councillor Vanderstelt, Councillor Utley, Councillor Sless, Councillor McCreary, Councillor Martin, Councillor Antoski, Councillor Van Tilborg, and Councillor Wall NO (1): Councillor Carpenter
Moved by Councillor Sless, seconded by Councillor Utley
WHEREAS the Owner of the property at 85 Colborne Street West would like to develop their lands located at the north west corner of Colborne Street West and Oak Street for a drive-through restaurant; and WHEREAS the Applicant involved attended a pre-consultation meeting on April 21, 2020 with City Staff and was informed at the meeting that to facilitate the development, an application to amend Zoning By-law 160-90 was required as well as the conveyance of a sight triangle and road widening to the City, (of approximately 3 metres) to achieve the ultimate right-of-way (ROW) width of 26 metres; and WHEREAS the conveyance of the sight triangle and road widening would be addressed at the site plan approval stage, pursuant to the policies in the Official Plan and the Planning Act; and WHEREAS the existing pattern of development along parts of Colborne Street West is established whereby there are buildings already located within the ultimate ROW width; and WHEREAS the applicant has indicated that the proposed site layout cannot be achieved if they are required to convey the sight triangle and the 3 metres of road widening; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that City Council WAIVE the requirements of the conveyance of the sight triangle and the road widening in the 6 consideration of a future site plan application for a drive- through restaurant affecting the lands located at 85 Colborne Street West. Recorded vote on Item 8.1: YES (10): Councillor Weaver, Councillor Vanderstelt, Councillor
Moved by Councillor Vanderstelt, seconded by Councillor Weaver
WHEREAS the City of Brantford has been blessed with several early pioneering families and settlers who laid the foundation for what we have today; and WHEREAS one of the early pioneers to Brantford was the Hayman family who settled in an area in what is now known as Baxter and Hanson streets in Ward 3; and WHEREAS other pioneers of the era have been recognized by the city, with parks and streets named after them; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT Staff and the Heritage Committee BE DIRECTED to research the history of the Hayman family and REPORT BACK to Council regarding how they can be recognized through such means as adding their name to the list of approved street names, or the naming of a municipal asset pursuant to Corporate Policy No. 023 – Municipal Naming Policy. Recorded vote on Item 8.2: YES: (10): Councillor Weaver, Councillor Vanderstelt, Councillor Utley, Councillor Sless, Councillor McCreary, Councillor Martin, Councillor Carpenter, Councillor Antoski, Councillor Van Tilborg, and Councillor Wall
Moved by Councillor Utley, seconded by Councillor Sless