Taken from the roll call in the town’s own minutes. The minutes record who was not there and almost never why.
What was decided (3 motions)
3 carried, 0 recorded otherwise. Every motion below is printed as the minutes print it.
THAT all Items for Consideration/ Consent Items (Items 7.1.2, 7.1.3, 7.2.2) not separated for discussion purposes BE APPROVED. Recorded vote on all Items for Consideration/ Consent Items (Items 7.1.2, 7.1.3 and 7.2.2) not separated for discussion purposes: YES (10): Mayor Davis, Councillor Vanderstelt, Councillor Utley, Councillor Sless, Councillor McCreary, Councillor Martin, Councillor Carpenter, Councillor Antoski, Councillor Van Tilborg and Councillor Wall
Moved by Councillor Antoski, seconded by Councillor Carpenter
Carried
In favour (10): Mayor Davis, Councillor Vanderstelt, Councillor Utley, Councillor Sless, Councillor McCreary, Councillor Martin, Councillor Carpenter, Councillor Antoski, Councillor Van Tilborg, Councillor Wall
A. THAT Zoning By-law Amendment Application PZ-09-19 submitted by Colborne Commons Inc., to change the Zoning of the lands located at 908-914 Colborne Street from “General Commercial Zone (C8)” to “General Commercial – Exception 99 Zone (C8-99)” to permit the development of two 6-storey apartment buildings, BE APPROVED, subject to the application of a ‘Holding’ provision and in accordance with the applicable provisions as noted in Section 8.2 of Report 2020-67; and B. THAT the By-law to remove the “Holding (H)” provision from the subject lands not be presented to Council for approval until the following conditions have been satisfied: i. That the applicant has provided a signed Site Plan Agreement to the City, along with all necessary securities; ii. That the applicant has satisfied the requirements of the Corporation of the City of Brantford relating to the Transportation Impact Study (TIS); and iii. That all servicing issues, financial and otherwise, have been addressed to the satisfaction of the Corporation of the City of Brantford; and C. THAT Pursuant to 34(18) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13. the following statement SHALL BE INCLUDED in the Notices of Decision: “Regard has been had for all written and oral submissions received from the public before the decision was made in relation to this planning matter, as discussed in Sections 7.2 and 8.2 of Report 2020-67.” Recorded vote on Item 5.1: YES (9): Mayor Davis, Councillor Vanderstelt, Councillor Utley, Councill
Moved by Councillor Wall, seconded by Councillor Antoski
Carried
In favour (9): Mayor Davis, Councillor Vanderstelt, Councillor Utley, Councillor Sless, Councillor Carpenter, Councillor Martin, Councillor Antoski, Councillor Van Tilborg, Councillor Wall
THAT all Items for Consideration/ Consent (Items 7.1.1 and 7.2.1) separated for discussion purposes BE APPROVED. Each item was considered separately and voted on individually. 7.1 ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION 7.1.1 Development Building Process Review Update [Financial Impact: None], 2020-364 Presentation Bruce Peever and Sana Malik, KPMG appeared before the Committee and provided an overview of the report. A PowerPoint presentation was made and a copy placed in the original meeting file. A discussion ensued regarding the next steps of implementation of the recommended changes. Recommendation A. THAT Report 2020-364 Development Building Process Review update BE RECEIVED; and B. THAT the necessary resources (Project Management Professional and Intermediate Planner, for up to 18 months) to carry out the implementation plan outlined in the KPMG Development Building Process Review final report BE
Moved by Councillor Vanderstelt, seconded by Councillor Martin
Carried
In favour (10): Mayor Davis, Councillor Vanderstelt, Councillor Utley, Councillor Sless, Councillor McCreary, Councillor Martin, Councillor Carpenter, Councillor Antoski, Councillor Van Tilborg, Councillor Wall