Committee of Adjustment

A. THAT Application A07/2020 requesting relief from the City of Brantford Zoning By-law 160-90 to permit a minimum front yard of 5.1 m, whereas 6 m is required and to permit a minimum rear yard of 6.1 m, whereas 7.5 m is required, BE APPROVED; and B. THAT the reason(s) for approval are as follows: the proposed variance is in keeping with the general intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, the relief requested is considered minor in nature and is desirable for the appropriate development and use of the subject land; and C. THAT pursuant to Section 45(8) – (8.2) of the Planning Act, R.S.O 1990, c.P.13, the following statement SHALL BE INCLUDED in the Notice of Decision: “Regard has been had for all written and oral submissions received from the public before the decision was made in relation to this planning matter, as discussed in Section 6.2 of Report No. 2020-198." Recorded vote on Item 3.1: YES: Virginia Kershaw, Tara Gaskin, Lee Rynar, Dan Namisniak, Greg Kempa and Krystyna Brooks – 6 NO: None – 0 Item 3.1

A. THAT Application A09/2020 requesting relief from Section 478.4.12 of Chapter 478 of the City of Brantford Municipal Code to permit the flashing illumination of a sign to be located 21 m from a residential zone, whereas a minimum of 40 m is required, BE APPROVED; and B. THAT the reason(s) for approval are as follows: the proposed variance is in keeping with the general intent of the Official Plan, Zoning By-law and Chapter 478 of the Municipal Code, the relief requested is considered minor in nature and is desirable for the appropriate development and use of the subject lands; and C. THAT pursuant to Section 45(8) – (8.2) of the Planning Act, R.S.O 1990, c.P.13, the following statement SHALL BE INCLUDED in the Notice of Decision: “Regard has been had for all written and oral submission received from the public before the decision was made in relation to this planning matter, as discussed in Section 6.2 and 7.5 of Report No. 2020-242.” Recorded vote on Item 3.2: YES: Virginia Kershaw, Tara Gaskin, Lee Rynar, Dan Namisniak and Krystyna Brooks – 5 NO: Greg Kempa – 1 Item 3.2

A. THAT Application B03/2020 to sever a parcel of land from the south side of the lands municipally addressed as 753 Colborne Street having an area of 226 m² and to retain a parcel of land having a lot area of 583 m² BE APPROVED, subject to the conditions attached in Appendix A of Report No. 2020-182; and B. THAT Application B04/2020 to sever a parcel of land from the south side of the lands municipally addressed as 755 Colborne Street, having an area of 226 m² and to retain a parcel of land having a lot area of 585 m² BE APPROVED, subject to the conditions attached in Appendix A1 of Report No. 2020-182; and 5 C. THAT the reason(s) for approval are as follows: Having regard for the matters under Section 51 (24) of the Planning Act, Staff is satisfied that the proposed development is desirable and compatible with the surrounding area and will not result in adverse impacts on surrounding properties; and D. THAT pursuant to Section 53(17)-(18.2) and Section 45(8)-(8.2) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13, the following statement SHALL BE INCLUDED in the Notice of Decision: “Regard has been had for all written and oral submissions received from the public before the decision was made in relation to this planning matter, as discussed in Section 6.2 and 7.4 of Report No. 2020-182.” Recorded vote on Item 3.3: YES: Virginia Kershaw, Tara Gaskin, Lee Rynar, Dan Namisniak and Greg Kempa – 5 NO: None – 0 Item 3.3

A. THAT Application B05/2020 to sever a parcel of land from the northeast corner of the lands municipally addressed as 41 Johnson Road having an area of 840 m² 6 and to retain a parcel of land having a lot area of 1.36 ha BE APPROVED, subject to the conditions attached in Appendix A of Report No. 2020-249; and B. THAT the reason(s) for approval are as follows: Having regard for the matters under Section 51 (24) of the Planning Act, Staff is satisfied that the proposed development is desirable and compatible with the surrounding area and will not result in adverse impacts on surrounding properties; and C. THAT pursuant to Section 53(17)-(18.2) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13, the following statement SHALL BE INCLUDED in the Notice of Decision: “Regard has been had for all written and oral submissions received from the public before the decision was made in relation to this planning matter, as discussed in Section 6.2 of Report No. 2020-249.” Recorded vote on Item 3.4: YES: Virginia Kershaw, Tara Gaskin, Lee Rynar, Dan Namisniak, Greg Kempa and Krystyna Brooks – 6 NO: None – 0 Item 3.4

THAT the following BE

THAT the following minutes BE APPROVED: 6.1.1 Committee of Adjustment - February 19, 2020 Recorded vote on Item 6.1 8 YES: Virginia Kershaw, Tara Gaskin, Lee Rynar, Dan Namisniak, Greg Kempa and Krystyna Brooks – 6 NO: None – 0 Item 6.1.1